public launch
2016The campaign page records a launch in São Tomé and Príncipe on 19 February 2016.
Elsa Figueira / Social-impact film / São Tomé and Príncipe
Elsa Figueira brought a documentary, a public launch, cast and crew, local partners, and international media coverage into one campaign platform. The website gave a sensitive social issue a visible public record while inviting people to watch, discuss, and support the work.
Documentary campaign
What Should Elsa Do?What eyes can see, we can change.
public launch
2016The campaign page records a launch in São Tomé and Príncipe on 19 February 2016.
site languages
3The live archive is available in English, Estonian, and Portuguese for local and international audiences.
media networks
5+The archive links coverage from VOA Português, RDP África, Deutsche Welle, RTP África, Rede Angola, and local media.
current role
ArchiveThe live site now preserves the film campaign, its people, partners, launch, and public response.
The premise
A social-impact film cannot rely on a synopsis alone. Visitors need to understand why the issue matters, who made the work, how the campaign entered public conversation, and what they can do after encountering it.
The website combined the documentary's central message with evidence of real participation: actors, creators, supporters, partners, launch photographs, interviews, and media appearances. Together they made the campaign feel locally rooted and publicly accountable.
The interaction model
The documentary title and central message establish the emotional stakes before the visitor encounters campaign logistics.
Cast, crew, creators, supporters, and partners show that the project was made through a wide local network.
Radio, television, press, and launch documentation extend the work beyond the website and record its reach.
Emotional entry
The documentary title creates an immediate human question. The interface supports that emotional entry with restraint, allowing the issue and the people involved to carry the weight rather than adding unnecessary campaign language.
Public proof
Interviews and appearances across local and international outlets show how the project moved through public culture. Organizing those references on the campaign page helped the film remain legible after the launch moment had passed.
Collective ownership
The large cast, creator, partner, and supporter sections communicate that the project belonged to more than one author. For a campaign about social awareness, showing that collective effort was part of the message.
What remains
The site now functions as an archive of a 2016 intervention. A visitor can understand that the documentary existed and see the community around it, but the experience does not yet clearly say whether the film can be watched, licensed, screened, taught, or used to access support today.
Next product decision
Turn the archive into a safeguarding-aware screening kit.State the project's current status, make screening or viewing information primary, provide facilitator materials, and add verified domestic-violence support resources appropriate to each audience and language.
Project record
This case study focuses on the website and campaign structure. The live archive contains the fuller record of actors, creators, partners, supporters, interviews, and media appearances.
Continue exploring
Optional analytics. Google Analytics and Clarity load only if allowed; form, email, and chat content are excluded.